Two playoff baseball games, two hockey games where the goalie is the story, the Monday night football game, and four Shanghai matches that start while you sleep. The widest gap of the day is in tennis, and it is almost certainly an injury the ratings cannot see. How to read this: for each game we work out what the chances should be, then compare that with what the betting odds say. Where the two disagree most, we write it up first.
Foster Griffin's 3.60 ERA flatters him: his expected ERA (what it should be, judged by how hard hitters actually hit him) is 4.35, and since Cleveland traded for him in August he has a 5.19 ERA. Drew Rasmussen's expected ERA is 3.06, and his last two starts were 14⅔ innings of one-hit-apiece baseball against the Yankees.
So the gap between the two starters is about a run and a third, the widest on the board. The odds make Tampa 60% and have not moved since they opened, which is roughly where that gap should put them.
Against it This is Griffin's first playoff start, and in his last outing he came on behind an opener and threw 53 pitches, so Cleveland may not ask him for more than four innings. Their two best relievers, Cade Smith and Gaddis, both pitched twice in the last five days, while Tampa's whole bullpen has had four days off. Everything here points the same way as the price; there is no edge against it.
| Starter | IP | ERA | xERA | ERA − xERA | K% | BB% | Barrel% | Hard-hit% | Exit velo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foster GriffinCLE · LHP | 172.2 | 3.60 | 4.35 | −0.75 | 21.9 | 6.2 | 8.3 | 37.0 | 87.8 |
| Drew RasmussenTB · RHP | 172.0 | 2.67 | 3.06 | −0.39 | 26.0 | 4.8 | 5.9 | 33.8 | 88.2 |
| Griffin | IP | H | ER | BB | K | Pitches | Fastball | Whiff % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7 | at CWS | 2.2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 53 | 92.3 | 28 | in relief |
| Sep 23 | at BOS | 6.0 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 83 | 91.0 | 27 | |
| Sep 15 | vs CWS | 4.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 83 | 92.0 | 29 | |
| Sep 9 | at BAL | 2.1 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 62 | 90.8 | 26 | |
| Sep 4 | vs DET | 6.0 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 92 | 91.8 | 21 |
| Rasmussen | IP | H | ER | BB | K | Pitches | Fastball | Whiff % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3 | vs NYY | 8.0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 101 | 96.2 | 43 |
| Sep 22 | at NYY | 6.2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 114 | 95.6 | 34 |
| Sep 17 | vs ATH | 5.0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 76 | 95.3 | 31 |
| Sep 11 | vs HOU | 7.0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 92 | 95.8 | 15 |
| Sep 5 | at TEX | 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 97 | 95.2 | 30 |
On expected ERA Logan Henderson (2.74) is a fifth of a run better than Yoshinobu Yamamoto (2.94), and he has twice held the Dodgers to one run or none this year. Yet the odds make Los Angeles 55% to win, which is the price of the better lineup and the deeper starter, not the better pitcher.
Milwaukee won Game 1 2–1 last night. Skubal went five innings on 81 pitches and Misiorowski 4⅓ on 94, so both bullpens did a lot of the work.
Against it Henderson has gone exactly five innings in each of his last four starts, and Yamamoto has gone six or more in seven straight, so the later innings tilt to the Dodgers. Ashby threw 26 pitches last night after 38 on Wednesday, and Uribe has pitched in all five Milwaukee playoff games. Three quarters of the money bet so far is on Los Angeles, and the line has still drifted slightly towards Milwaukee.
| Starter | IP | ERA | xERA | ERA − xERA | K% | BB% | Barrel% | Hard-hit% | Exit velo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoshinobu YamamotoLAD · RHP | 185.0 | 2.53 | 2.94 | −0.41 | 25.7 | 5.9 | 6.5 | 35.5 | 87.7 |
| Logan HendersonMIL · RHP | 98.1 | 2.47 | 2.74 | −0.27 | 29.6 | 5.1 | 8.3 | 36.9 | 88.3 |
| Yamamoto | IP | H | ER | BB | K | Pitches | Fastball | Whiff % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6 | at ATL | 7.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 98 | 96.6 | 37 |
| Sep 23 | vs SD | 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 88 | 95.7 | 24 |
| Sep 15 | at CIN | 7.0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 91 | 96.5 | 36 |
| Sep 9 | vs CIN | 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 90 | 96.8 | 41 |
| Sep 2 | vs STL | 7.0 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 93 | 96.5 | 38 |
| Henderson | IP | H | ER | BB | K | Pitches | Fastball | Whiff % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4 | vs SD | 5.0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 72 | 94.4 | 27 |
| Sep 23 | at PHI | 5.0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 87 | 93.4 | 18 |
| Sep 16 | at PIT | 5.0 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 87 | 93.3 | 28 |
| Sep 9 | vs CHC | 5.0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 95 | 93.4 | 28 |
| Sep 3 | at CHC | 7.0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 102 | 93.4 | 26 |
The odds make this a coin flip. The ratings give Minnesota 55%, and the money has moved a point and a half towards Vegas since the open, away from them.
Jesper Wallstedt is the case for Minnesota: in five games he has saved about six goals more than an average goalie would have, and Vegas have not yet said whether Carter Hart or Adin Hill starts for them.
Against it Five games is a small sample, and goalies this hot almost always cool. Wallstedt also played on Saturday in Florida and has had one day off since. If Hill starts for Vegas the case for Minnesota gets stronger; if Hart starts it is roughly as described here.
| Odds say | Minnesota 50% · Vegas 50% |
| Ratings say | Minnesota 55% at home · 5 points apart, on Minnesota |
| Line | Opened VGK −102 / MIN −118 · now about −110 each · 1.5 points towards Vegas, away from the ratings |
| Wallstedt, MIN · confirmed | Sat at Florida: 29 saves on 30 shots; the chances were worth 3.3 goals, so he saved about two more than an average goalie would have · Thu at Tampa Bay: 32 on 35, chances worth 3.6, half a goal better than average · Tue at Buffalo: 25 on 28, chances worth 4.2, a goal better than average · Season: .936, about six goals better than average in five games · Gustavsson is on long-term injured reserve (hip) |
| Hart, VGK · unconfirmed | Sat v Los Angeles: 26 saves on 27; chances worth 1.9, about a goal better than average · Tue at Seattle: 25 on 27; chances worth 2.6, half a goal better · Fri 2 Oct v Anaheim: 16 on 20; chances worth 2.7, so he let in about 1.3 more than an average goalie · Season: .910, average · Hill possible instead: .886 this season, about a goal worse than average |
New Jersey opened at 56% and are down to 52%. The ratings give them 54%, so the market has moved through most of the gap and the two now nearly agree.
The move makes sense once you see the goalies: Linus Ullmark has been one of the best in the league so far, and New Jersey are starting their backup, Nico Daws.
Against it Ratings this early in the season are still mostly last year's, and they cannot see who is in goal. With the price now within two points of the rating there is no real edge either way; this card is here for the goalies.
| Odds say | New Jersey 52% · Ottawa 48% |
| Ratings say | New Jersey 54% at home · 1.4 points apart |
| Line | Opened OTT +115 / NJD −140 · now +100 / −120 · 3 points towards Ottawa |
| Ullmark, OTT · confirmed | Sat v Nashville: 16 saves on 18; chances worth 1.8, about average · Thu v Philadelphia: 28 on 29; chances worth 3.5, so he saved two and a half goals more than an average goalie · Mon 5 Oct at Boston: 10 on 10 in two periods; chances worth 1.6 · Season: .942, about five goals better than average |
| Daws, NJD · confirmed | Sat 3 Oct at the Islanders: 26 saves on 32; chances worth 3.6, so he let in about 2.4 more than an average goalie · 14 Apr (last season) at Boston: 22 on 26, about a goal worse than average · 12 Apr (last season) v Ottawa: 27 on 30, about average · Season: .812 in one game |
Nothing has changed since Saturday's card: the ratings put these teams almost level, so with home field the Rams are a third of a point better, and every book has the Rams by three and a half.
The final injury reports cut both ways. Buffalo lose Ed Oliver, their best interior pass rusher, and receiver Joshua Palmer; but Benford and Sanders, both questionable midweek, are cleared.
Against it Buffalo +3.5 is now priced at −115 to −120 across the board, which means the books are getting Buffalo money and the line is more likely to drop to 3 than rise to 4. Taking the points is the popular side. D.J. Moore is a game-time decision with a shoulder, and Buffalo fly cross-country for a night game.
| Line | Opened LAR −2.5 · now LAR −3.5 everywhere · money line LAR −176 / BUF +148 · total 54.5 |
| ELWAY | LAR by 0.35 · 3.15-point gap, on Buffalo |
| Buffalo, 3–1 | Lost 29–26 to New England last week · out: Ed Oliver (knee), Joshua Palmer (shoulder) · questionable: D.J. Moore (shoulder), Alford, Landon Jackson · cleared: Benford, Sanders · Bills injury report |
| Los Angeles, 2–2 | Won 24–20 at Philadelphia last week from 20–10 down · questionable: Quentin Lake (hip) · cleared: Jaylen Watson, Mumpfield · Rams injury report |
The hard-court ratings make Alex de Minaur a 69% chance. The odds make him 52%, seventeen points lower.
That is not the market missing something. De Minaur retired from the Beijing final against Djokovic six days ago with an adductor injury and was due to have scans here; the results have not been published.
Against it Everything argues against taking the ratings' side. He has won twice here since, but one of those was a walkover, and money has kept coming for Khachanov all day. This card is here to explain the gap, not to back it.
| Odds say | De Minaur 52% · Khachanov 48% |
| Ratings say | De Minaur 69% · 17 points apart · ratings last updated 5 October, before the injury |
| Line | Opened De Minaur 1.71 / Khachanov 2.24 · now 1.87 / 2.04 · 4.5 points towards Khachanov |
| Fitness | De Minaur retired from the Beijing final (adductor), 7 Oct; scans planned in Shanghai, results not published |
| This week | De Minaur: walkover, then Sakamoto 7–6 6–4 · Khachanov: Fery in three tiebreaks, then Mannarino 6–2 6–4 |
| Head-to-head | 2–2 · Paris 2025 to De Minaur 6–2 6–2; Vienna 2024 and Dubai 2022 to Khachanov; US Open 2020 to De Minaur |
The odds give Alexander Zverev 72%. The ratings give him 78%.
Alexander Bublik leads their head-to-head 3–1, but the last meeting was in 2023, and two of his three wins were on grass and indoor courts.
Against it Zverev grabbed his left ankle during his second-round match and played on; nothing has been said about it since. Bublik has come through two close matches here, including Nakashima in a final-set tiebreak, and the price has drifted a little his way.
| Odds say | Zverev 72% · Bublik 28% |
| Ratings say | Zverev 78% · 6 points apart, on Zverev |
| Line | Opened Bublik 3.69 / Zverev 1.32 · now 3.51 / 1.35 · 1.5 points towards Bublik |
| This week | Zverev: Wu, then Halys in three · Bublik: Machac, then Nakashima 6–7 6–3 7–6 |
| Head-to-head | Bublik 3–1 · Halle 2023 (grass), Montpellier 2022 and Rotterdam 2021 (indoor) to Bublik; Monte Carlo 2023 (clay) to Zverev |
The odds make Hubert Hurkacz a slight favourite at 52%. The ratings give him 46%, so they have Alejandro Davidovich Fokina as the better side.
Davidovich Fokina leads their meetings 5–2, beat Hurkacz in the Chengdu final two weeks ago, and has won six straight since coming back from injury.
Against it Hurkacz has beaten Djokovic and Zhou here and serves well enough to win any match in two tiebreaks. Davidovich Fokina needed a final-set tiebreak to get past Tiafoe on Sunday, and he was out from July until late September.
| Odds say | Hurkacz 52% · Davidovich Fokina 48% |
| Ratings say | Davidovich Fokina 54% · 6 points apart, on Davidovich Fokina |
| Line | Opened Hurkacz 1.87 / Davidovich Fokina 2.02 · now 1.88 / 2.03 · flat |
| This week | Hurkacz: Duckworth, Djokovic 6–4 6–3, Zhou · Davidovich Fokina: Brooksby, Tiafoe 7–6 4–6 7–6 |
| Head-to-head | Davidovich Fokina 5–2 · latest: Chengdu final, 28 Sep, 6–4 7–6 |
The odds give Jakub Mensik 59%, the ratings 60%. There is nothing between them.
The story is Gea, who has beaten Humbert and the third seed Ben Shelton this week and is 29–5 on hard courts this season, and the money has come his way.
Against it Carded because it was asked for, not because there is an edge. The line has moved four points towards Gea, which is the market already taking the run seriously.
| Odds say | Mensik 59% · Gea 41% |
| Ratings say | Mensik 60% · 1.4 points apart |
| Line | Opened Gea 2.60 / Mensik 1.55 · now 2.34 / 1.66 · 4 points towards Gea |
| This week | Gea: Faria, Humbert, Shelton 7–6 7–6 · Mensik: Kecmanovic, F. Cerundolo 6–3 3–6 6–2 |
| Head-to-head | never played |
Two of five went the ratings' way. Hurkacz and Zverev, where the ratings were more confident than the odds, both won. Davidovich Fokina, Bublik and Mensik all won against the side the ratings leaned towards, and in all three the money had been moving against the ratings during the day.